🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a misguided assessment of Europe. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "woke" policies represent an grave risk to European civilization. However, this perspective is based on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The actual challenge confronting Europe is not cultural but technological and economic lag.

A Glaring Economic Gap Between the US and Europe

The data paint a sobering contrast. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by 87%, compared to a paltry 13.5% increase for the European Union. During this time, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just half of the American figure. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now has a higher per capita income than major European economies like France and Italy.

Today, roughly 50% of the global top fifty tech companies are American, while only four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Problem

The growing economic gap is driven by stronger efficiency gains in the US, fueled by breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly American. In the last fifty years, 241 US firms have scaled into companies valued at more than $10bn, versus only fourteen in Europe.

This gap prompts a vital question: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, where does the EU positioned? Most analysts agree it is essentially a contest between two involving the United States and China, with European nations entering at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Innovation Gap

A number of key factors account for this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a far deeper and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, which limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided regulation hinder European business. A American entrepreneur can introduce a service under one set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The EU, despite a bigger population size, is divided among twenty-seven separate systems, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often considered a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these hurdles, there are reasons for hope. European leaders are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have begun to propose serious reform. Key analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market point to the necessity of sweeping changes.

With the right incentives and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths might enable much higher levels of commercial innovation.

The continent retains significant strengths: skilled human capital, top-tier education systems, and world-class research institutions. Coupled with a large internal market and substantial household savings, these elements could trigger a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if the EU does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge tech, it can still significantly increase economic output by implementing and tailoring advancements from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now faces a decisive moment. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, the continent's technological decline has been steady. But, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent decline in global economic relevance.