🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the crisis sparked by the announcement of a new 28-point plan for achieving ceasefire appeared – briefly – to have been contained. A senior US official spoke of "significant advancement" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its response: a renewed assault of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Peace Talks and Military Action

The succession of conflicting incidents captured the bleak nature of the current period. By day, political struggles are waged: optimistic declarations are issued from various governments. Significant resources is devoted on restraining particular approaches. By night, Moscow clearly shows the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the primary tool for achieving "peace".

Nighttime Reality

As the offensive unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the immediate reality of Ukraine's defenselessness was revealed. Ukraine is able to track projectile deployments from Russian territory, a capacity provided through timely intelligence. From vantage locations, military aircraft that had been dispatched to engage hostile cruise missiles flew past – modern combat jets provided to Ukraine by NATO members.

Moments later, Kyiv's air-defence systems activated: defensive missiles deployed against a Russian ballistic missile. This was a modern interception technology at work, probably provided by Western nations. Every firing jolts you unexpectedly, shaking the windows. The moment of terror quickly transforms into resigned acknowledgment: maybe the approaching threat won't cause damage this time, preventing destruction from devastation and further power outages.

Ongoing Risks

Following this, a large-caliber weapon fired at a unmanned aircraft in the vicinity, part of a defensive team – most likely Western-made equipment. Regrettably, the shots failed to hit the opposing UAV – it maintained course toward its objective.

With pauses, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv faced the early updates: several casualties, damage and heating outages in multiple buildings as a result of the night's assault. As typically, everyone still maintained normal activities – living the war. But those 24 hours encapsulated Ukraine's critical military reliance on external assistance – a reliance that neighboring countries are demonstrably unable to substitute in the short term.

Failed Diplomacy

The 28-point plan from Washington provoked deep reactions, debate and profound anxiety – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after earlier high-level meetings and international summits.

Every new initiative from American administration adheres to the same pattern: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, succeeds in resisting. They stabilise the situation but never actually secure success. This pattern will, certainly, continue.

Strategic Calculations

It is easy to blame particular leaders of persistently promoting Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. American leadership operates on a assumption familiar among international relations experts: you cannot secure via talks what you have been unable to protect through force. The White House assumes that it is impossible to force Russia to abandon the areas that it currently occupies in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The issue is that while recognising this factual reality, Washington does little to prevent Kremlin actions, through statements or actions, from assuming that the current condition will not change more in its advantage in the near future.

Divergent Views

Therefore, Moscow is certain that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its supporters are nearing depletion. Their reason to accept conditions that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is virtually nonexistent. There may be multiple initiatives to end hostilities, but they will persist as long as Russia's leadership remains completely certain in the result.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still endure, progressively conceding lives and land but preventing a entire defensive failure until conditions improve in its benefit.

Current Realities

Factually, there are no actual prerequisites for a armistice. Now, individual motivations are entering the equation: personal goals to negotiate peace and achieve global acclaim, and the government's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the national cause against any initiative Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their focus does not move to domestic problems. And although their task will now be considerably more difficult after latest incidents, it remains highly unlikely that this will change their overall approach.

These opposing factors are guiding negotiations.

Summary and Prospects

It took a only one week to eliminate the 28 points of the most recent proposal. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by American leadership, resistance by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with calming attempts of diplomats, and finally, current information leaks, all served their function.

While new plans based on previous concepts are approaching, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off political attacks from Washington that are rooted in Kremlin requirements and demonstrate particular unwillingness to change the course of events, if they maintain solidarity and improve their protective measures at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to repel nightly air assaults will, for the coming months, mainly require sustained allied backing.